Field Evaluations vs. Traditional Certifications: Understanding the Key Differences
Confused between Field Evaluations and traditional Certifications? Read this article to understand the key differences and determine which one is the right fit for your product.
Did you know that ‘Field Evaluations’ started in the 1960s? Industry and Authorities Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) needed something to access the safety of custom equipment. UL and the NRTLs came up with the Field Evaluation Labeling program. But do you know the difference between a field evaluation and certification?
Read this guide to learn about the difference. Explore the Field Evaluation vs Full Certification comparison and certification guide to find the right program for your business.
Field Evaluations: An Overview
Field Evaluation labeling is a practical and acceptable alternative (but not a substitute) to traditional product certification. The service provides you with on-the-spot testing, evaluation and labeling of your products. The testing and evaluation is non-destructive, and is based on published requirements accepted by the Authorities Having Jurisdiction (AHJ). Complying products will be immediately labeled with a distinctive, serialized label per the AHJ requirements.
One of the primary benefits of Field Evaluations is the flexibility they offer to product developers and manufacturers. For low volume and small lot production, your products can be labeled within 1-2 weeks and get to market quickly.
Moreover, since it’s a one-time effort, there are no Follow Up Service Inspections.
Overall, Field Evaluations offer a practical and efficient approach to product safety and compliance assessments for one-time installations, low volume and short run production. They provide flexibility, cost savings, and real-world assessments, making them a preferred choice for a variety of industries.
Traditional Certifications: An Overview
Traditional (Full) Certifications involve laboratory testing and assessments to ensure product safety and regulatory compliance. Regulatory bodies and industry standards often require these Certifications and have been the go-to approach for many years.
The advantage of Full Certification is you are allowed to apply the NRTL label on the products as you produce them so they hit the market already Certified.
However, the process can take up to 16 or more weeks and once you pass, your factory will be subjected to Quarterly inspections by the NRTL.
Cost Difference
Speaking of costs, Full Certification is more expensive up front but if you’re a high volume manufacturer the ROI with Full Certification is much higher. This is primarily because products that get Full Certification get fully tested – non-destructive and destructive testing.
Due to the nature of the laboratory testing, Full Certifications also have longer lead times. The coordination required between the manufacturer and the testing facility and the time it takes for testing and analysis can delay a product’s time to market. In today’s fast-paced industries, this delay can significantly impact a company’s competitiveness. Planning ahead and knowing you’re going to pass before submitting is critical.
Determining Your Product’s Needs: Field Evaluations or Traditional Certifications
Choosing between field evaluations and traditional certifications depends on various factors specific to your product and industry. Here are a few considerations to help you determine which approach is right for your product:
- Industry requirements: Some industries have specific regulations or standards that clearly outline the need for traditional certifications. It’s essential to research and understand the compliance standards relevant to your industry before making a decision. Consulting with experts in your industry can provide valuable insights into the expectations and requirements for product safety certifications.
- Time and cost constraints: If time and cost are key factors for your product, field evaluations may present a more favorable option. The flexibility and efficiency of on-site evaluations can help save time and money in the certification process. Conducting a cost-benefit analysis and evaluating the impact of time-to-market on your product’s success can guide you in the decision-making process.
- Low or high volume manufacturing: Field Evaluations can get you to market quickly but over time and with high volumes can end up more expensive than Full Certification.
By carefully considering these factors and weighing the pros and cons of Field Evaluations and Full Certifications, you can make an informed decision that aligns with your product’s needs and objectives.
Securing Product Safety
When it comes to securing product safety and regulatory compliance, deciding between Field Evaluations and Full Certifications is a critical step for product developers and manufacturers. Understanding the key differences and considering your product’s specific requirements will empower you to make an informed decision.
It is crucial to research industry requirements, evaluate time and cost constraints, and consider the influence of real-world conditions on your product’s performance. Whether you choose a field evaluation or a traditional certification, prioritizing safety and compliance will build trust and confidence in your products.
Take the next step towards securing product safety and regulatory compliance by contacting Product Safety Consulting today. With over three decades of experience, our expert team has been providing product developers and manufacturers with advice and testing services to meet industry standards and regulations. Visit our website to learn more and ensure the safety and regulatory compliance of your products.